Show notes
Writer/director Alex Garland's Annihilation (opens in a new tab) (2018) stars Natalie Portman as Lena, a biologist, who has lost her husband to a place called Area X. She is a part of a team that goes into Area X, perhaps in search of answers, or for something more.
Tony Black (opens in a new tab) and Chris Stachiw (opens in a new tab) join Mike to discuss the film, Jeff VanderMeer's Southern Reach trilogy (opens in a new tab), and more.
Tony Black (opens in a new tab) and Chris Stachiw (opens in a new tab) join Mike to discuss the film, Jeff VanderMeer's Southern Reach trilogy (opens in a new tab), and more.
Labels: 2018 Alex Garland Chris Stachiw Jennifer Jason Leigh Natalie Portman Oscar Isaac Tony Black
Watch
Music credits
- "Helplessly Hoping" - Crosby, Stills, & Nash
Links & resources
Related episodes
Episodes that share keywords with this one.
Big Trouble in Little China (1986)
Shared: Tony Black
Sandy King Carpenter, W.D. Richter, Vincenzo Natali, Tony Black
Comments (3)
John Atom At the risk of sounding like "old man yells at cloud," I'm one of those people who doesn't really get the appeal of Annihilation. I though it had a weak plot, weak character, and bad use of symbolism disguised as "ambiguity." But what bothered me the most about the film is that it was specifically a bad *science fiction* film. Generally, bad science doesn't bother me in sci-fi, but Annihilation builds its entire "philosophical premise" on certain scientific principles brought up in the film, most of which they get wrong. It's therefore really hard to take its philosophy seriously when even basic facts are misrepresented. The "Lovecraftian" influences are certainly interesting, but also badly accomplished in my opinion. The essence of Lovecraftian cosmic horror is not a particular monster or weirdness, but the literal incomprehensibility of it. Lovecraft characters often go insane because they try to comprehend something that is, by definition, impossible to comprehend, and impossibly to visualize. It's meant to represent the inherent incomprehensibility of the cosmos (he was heavily influenced by the new science of his time, like Relativity and Quantum Mechanics). That's why it's so scary, and that is also why film adaptations of Lovecraft are very difficult to do. Film is a visual medium, but how do you visualize something that is literally impossible to visualize? I don't think Annihilation solves this problem, and in the end reduces everything to an simple entity. I do agree, however, that the film is AMAZING to look at. Worth watching just for that. But as a film, I was deeply disappointed by it.Anonymous Wonderful to hear your sidebar discussion on Cosmic Horror in cinema. Funny enough, after I listened to this episode I went to Youtube to find RLM just uploaded a Re:VIEW on IN THE MOUTH OF MADNESS! (Is there MADNESS in the air?)Anonymous Great show. Really enjoyed Annihilation during both viewings (once theatrically and once on DVD). Awesome to hear it discussed at such depth.