Episode 133 · Film year 2007

There Will Be Blood (2007)

· 2h 56m

Special Guests
Kevin Mattson, C.J. Wallis
Download Open in Spreaker (opens in a new tab)
Artwork for There Will Be Blood (2007)
There Will Be Blood (2007)
Episode 133 · The Projection Booth
0:00
2h 56m
MP3

Show notes

We drink your milkshake and talk about PT Anderson's modern classic, There Will Be Blood.

Our special guests, Kevin Mattson, is the author of Upton Sinclair and the Other American Century and C.J. Wallis curates "Cigarettes and Red Vines: The Definitive Paul Thomas Anderson Resource" website.

We're joined by Jeff Meyers, film reviewer for the Detroit's Metro Times, editor of ConcentrateMedia.com (opens in a new tab) and MetroModeMedia.com (opens in a new tab). Jeff's publications have featured The Projection Booth (opens in a new tab) and Rob St. Mary (opens in a new tab).

Labels: CJ Wallis Daniel Day-Lewis Jeff Meyers Kevin Mattson PT Anderson Upton Sinclair

Watch

Links & resources

Episodes that share keywords with this one.

Episode 500 ·

Brazil (1985)

Shared: Jeff Meyers

Michael Palin, Jeff Meyers, Skizz Cyzyk

Episode 491 ·

The Frighteners (1996)

Shared: Jeff Meyers

Jeffrey Combs, Grant Major, Jeff Meyers, Chris Stachiw

Episode 362 ·

Winter Kills (1979)

Shared: Jeff Meyers

William Richert, Jeff Meyers, Matthew Socey

Episode 246 ·

Shallow Grave (1994)

Shared: Jeff Meyers

Mark Browning, John Hodge, Jeff Meyers

Comments (4)

  1. William J. White
    Even though I try to listen to every episode when it's new and fresh, I had to hold off on this one for a while due to a lack of free-time, and the length of the actual episode. That said; now that I have finally listened to the whole thing; I have to agree with Mike on this one. Yes, I do think that There Will Be Blood is a wonderful piece of filmmaking, and it is centered with an incredible performance by Daniel Day-Lewis. But, the movie failed to connect with me on a personal level. This is an honest appraisal as I see it, not exactly a negative criticism because I am uncertain as to what it was that Anderson was hoping to convey. Epic? Yes. Brilliant? Yes. But, emotionally hollow? For me, yes. Do not get me wrong, I admire the film, I think it's hard to criticize it in a negative way, and it is certainly an excellently made piece of art. But, it is a hard film to like, and a difficult movie to connect with on an emotional level.
  2. Anonymous
    Initially I wasn't inclined to listen to this episode, but I'm really glad I did. TWBB is the first film I ever encountered where not only did it not resonate with me, I didn't understand why it was considered a masterpiece. Most reviews & user comments were of the "If you don't think this is a Masterpiece, go back to watching Michael Bay movies" variety. Listening to this episode, Rob & Jeff do a great job articulating WHY it's considered a masterpiece. I'm still not a fan of the film, but I'm glad I finally understand why others are.
  3. Anonymous
    I don’t understand Mike’s complaints about Boogie Nights being derivative of Scorsese. I agree that it is Goodfellas+Raging Bull. However, Mike is ok with Body Double being Rear Window+Vertigo for some reason.
    1. Mike White
      DePalma does his copying with style. PTA is just a hack, IMO.

Leave a comment

Never shown on the site. We use it only if we need to reply.

Comments are held for approval. Please keep it civil.